4/23/1997	16:08	129.2.5.120	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	5	6	All based on the same concept, however, it went a little too fast to recall all of the details.
4/23/1997	16:09	129.2.5.123	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	4	4	worst: good texture 
4/23/1997	16:09	129.2.5.123	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	4	4	worst: good texture 
4/23/1997	16:11	129.2.5.125	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	4	4	It allows large amounts of information to be presented in a short time. But the sequencing of events can be hard to follow.
4/25/1997	10:15	129.2.5.129	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	6	6	picture blurry, not clear.  Objects were presented too fast, most objects were not clearly identified or identified at all. 
4/25/1997	10:15	129.2.5.120	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)		5	Again there was no sound (bad aspect). This time it seemed the clips ran a little slower (Better aspect).
4/25/1997	10:25	129.2.5.121	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	2	3	It was slow enough that we could see the actions taking place, but we never fully understood what the purpose of the two men capturing the  monkeys was.  (unless I missed a syringe)
4/25/1997	11:12	129.2.5.120	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	4	4	The best aspect is the sequence made it clear what was going on but the size of the picture made it difficult to make out details.
4/30/1997	14:11	129.2.5.120	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)		5	This kind of video display was too small.  It is hard to make out all the details.  The best aspect was that it is more interesting then just looking at pictures.