4/9/1997	14:22	129.2.5.128	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	7,2	6,3	I don't see anything good about the kind of video display. Most of the pictures were imperceptible. I had a hard time trying to see them all at once, to the point where I saw hardly nothing.
4/21/1997	16:22	129.2.5.129	Mozilla/3.01Gold (Win95; I)	7,5	6,5	too many changing at the same time.. focus is split.. two at the same time would probally be good. if the were all different they would be more perceviable.. as i was getting confused witht h
w upper left and lower right frames..as they were sort of set in a jungle type enviroment. 
4/23/1997	16:10	129.2.5.128	Mozilla/3.01Gold (Win95; I)	6,4	7,4	As before, the best part is the short time it takes to tell a story, and the worst is the fact that comprehension is practically nonexistent.
4/23/1997	16:11	129.2.5.126	Mozilla/3.01Gold (Win95; I)	7,1	7,1	best-I see no positive aspects of showing three films at once. w-You can not concentrate on all three.
4/25/1997	11:16	129.2.5.129	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	6,6	6,6	again, the display moved too fast, and there were too many parts to pay attention to at once. the good part is that some people can comprehend at this speed.
4/25/1997	11:17	129.2.5.124	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	7,1	6,1	The worst aspect is that I couldn't understand everything that was going on.  I had to keep looking at different videos which made it hard to remember each one.  I can't really think of a best as
pect for this display
4/30/1997	14:14	129.2.5.122	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	4,1	3,2	There was no good aspects. The bad aspects were too many videos at once and the speed of the frames.
4/30/1997	14:17	129.2.5.127	Mozilla/3.01 (Win95; I)	6,2	7,1	It was hard to focus on the three videos at once and be able to understand the story being told in each. The top two boxes were easierto follow because they were next to eachother, but the box in
 the bottom right hand corner was hard to pay attention to.