| |
Abstract Introduction Experiment Results Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgements References Appendices Credits Feedback Back To Main |
Comparison of Telephone Menu InterfacesReferences[1] HyperVoice: A Phone-Based CSCW Platform Multimedia Systems / Paul Resnick Proceedings of ACM CSCW'92 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1992 p. 218-225 [2] Skip and Scan: Cleaning Up Telephone Interfaces Buttons and Gestures and Voice, Oh My! / Paul Resnick / Robert A. Virzi Proceedings of ACM CHI'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1992, p.419-426 [3] Michaelis, Paul Roller, and Wiggins, Richard H., A human factors engineer's introduction to speech synthesizers. In Badre, A. and Shneiderman, B. (Editors), Directions in Human-Computer Interaction, Ablex, Norwood, NJ (1982), p. 149-178 [4] Miller, G. A., The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information, Psychological Science, 63, (1956), p. 81-87 [5] MailCall: Message Presentation and Navigation in a Nonvisual Environment PAPERS: News and Mail / Matthew Marx / Chris Schmandt Proceedings of ACM CHI 96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1996 v.1 p.165-172 [6] C. Schmandt. "Phoneshell: the Telephone as Computer Terminal" Proceedings of ACM Multimedia Conference, August 1993. [7] E. Ly. "Chatter: A Conversational Telephone Agent" MIT Master's Thesis, Program in Media Arts and Sciences, 1993. [8] N. Yankelovich, G. Levow, and M. Marx. "Designing SpeechActs: Issues in Speech Interfaces." Proceedings of CHI `95, Denver, CO, May 8-11, 1995. [9] Virzi, R. A., and Huitema, J. S. (1997). Telephone-based menus: Evidence that broader is better than deeper. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, p. 315-319. [10] Gardner-Bonneau, D. J. (1992a, October). Human factors problems in interactive voice response (IVR) applications: Do we need a guideline/standard? Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, p. 222-226. [11] Schumacher, R.M., Hardzinski, M.L., and Schwartz, A.L. (1995). Increasing the usability of interactive voice response systems: Research and guidelines for phone-based interfaces. Human Factors, 37(2), p. 251-264. [12] Lund, A.M. (1999). Why do people dial wrong numbers? Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems, p. 187-203. [13] Deringer, R.L. (1960). Human factors engineering studies of the design and use of pushbutton telephone sets. The Bell System Technical Journal, 39(4), p. 995-1012. [14] Wikell, G. (1982). The layout of digits on pushbutton telephones: A review of the literature. TELE, 34(1), p. 34-45. [15] Francis, A.L., and Nusbaum, H.C. (1999). Evaluating the quality of synthetic speech. Human Factors and Voice Interactive Systems, p. 63-97. [16] Hecker, M.H., and Williams, C.E. (1966) Choice of reference conditions for speech preference tests. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, p. 946-952. [17] Williams, C.E., and Hecker, M.H. (1968). Relation between inteliigibility score for four test methods and three types of speech distortion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, p. 1002-1006.
[18] Greenspan, S.L., Nusbaum, H.C., and Pisoni, D.B. (1988). Perception of synthetic
speech produced by rule: Intellgibility of eight text-to-speech systems. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and
Computers,18, p. 100-107.
|
Department of Computer Science: Direct questions and comments to the student editorial team |
|