Abstract
Introduction
Experiment
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Acknowledgements
References
Appendices
Credits
Back To
Main
|
Website Structural Navigation
Introduction
Imagine a group of friends decide to play a joke. They blindfold one
person in that group and drop them off in the middle of the woods with no
map. That person is lost and has no guide or reference point to make it
back home in time for The Simpsons. But what if there was some
helpful navigational devices around? What if there were signs placed in
certain points of the forest with a clear path towards home? The journey
from point A to point B simple and easy.
Now relate that experience to the webbeing lost in the woods is
often the same principle. A random link or bookmark may drop someone off
in the middle of a complex website. Poorly designed ones would leave that
person stuck with nowhere to turn. On the other hand, sites with advanced
navigational devices have clear signs pointing users in the right
direction.
Navigation is key to any websitelarge or small. Pages need
to have an easy way for people to move to another one within its site.
At the very least, a link to the homepage allows users to start at the
top. Without a homepage link (or any navigation whatsoever), the page is
called a "dead-end page" because readers are locked out from the rest of
the site [Lynch, 15].
A line from the Fraggle Rock song "Lost and Found" states: You don't know
where you've been till you're homeward bound. That obscure reference is
an accurate description of websites that force people to go to the
top-level home and find their way back down again. It leaves people lost
and confused. On the same lines, using a browser's Back button
should only be a last resort because it forces them to retrace their steps
out of the website, perhaps never to come back again [Sano, 86].
Where Am I?
Random web pages that all look similar provide little help in users
knowing where they are. If a person has to ask "Where am I?" or "How did
I get here?" then the site is an example of poor organization and
navigation [Sano, 88; Marlatt]. When the structure is clear and
presentable, people are more confident and can navigate to new information
much faster. In simple terms, people cannot know where to go unless they
know where they are.
Navigation Aids
There are many devices in use to facilitate navigation within a website.
The sidebar, as seen on this site, has links to every top-level
page as well as the homepage. They are unobtrusive and help people travel
around sites [Waters, Universal Web Design, 44]. This aid is also
typically seen horizontally on the top or bottom of pages. Some of the
presentation styles that designers use include: text-only links, graphical
links, highlights and animations when the mouse rolls over the words,
drop-down lists, imagemaps and popup menus. Structurally, they usually
consist of the highest level pages in the site's architecture.
Another term for one of these guiding aids is a navigation bar (nav bar
for short). The one particular type that this experiment is testing is a
hierarchical navigation bar. They are typically defined by the term "You
Are Here" and list the structure of the site in such a way that users can
see how to reach the current page from the homepage. They are ordered from
broad to narrow topics. For example, a nav bar in a page about the
Baltimore Orioles from a sports website would look similar to
You Are Here: Sports Home > Baseball > MLB > Teams > Orioles
It is a clear design that shows the navigation pathway. A user jumping
straight to this page would know instantly where they were on the site and
how to go back up to broader categories without needing to work their way
down from the homepage (or use a search engine).
Some easily identifiable sites that use these nav bars are Yahoo!, C|Net, AOL.com, Netscape Netcenter and even the University of Maryland. They each use the
bars in addition to other navigation aids (such as side and top bars) to
give users a strong indication of their current location and how to go
back to more general information without having to resort to going to the
homepage. Logically, they are essential navigation aids for any website
that people would travel into at random places.
As of this paper's writing, no experimental studies have been ever been
written about these specific nav bars. There are many books and papers about website navigation
and design, but they mostly discuss the fact that having any type of
navigation aid is important. Of those few that mention nav bars, the only
comment are that they are extremely useful and help users identify the
hierarchy. They never address if it has been proven that nav bars help
users identify their current location and answer the "where am I?"
question. Do they help navigation by linking to direct ancestor levels of
the current page? Or do they have no practical use and just waste screen
space? This experiment attempted to answer those questions.
Example
What if a person follows a link in any search engine to end up at the
clarinet section page of the Maryland Marching Band? How does that user
find information on the saxophone section members? If there existed a
link to the top-level School of Music page, they could follow links down
from there. But how does anyone know if they are on the same website,
especially if the colors and styles of the pages change? Or where to go
from the main band website? With nav bars, a line similar to this could
be displayed:
School of Music > Maryland Bands > Marching Band > Instruments >
Clarinets
That bar would, in theory, help people know where they are on the site and
how to back up. So to find the saxophones, clicking on
Instruments, would most likely lead in the right direction without
having to start from the homepage.
Usefulness
From informal questioning, most people actually do not look at nav
bars. They feel more comfortable just going back to the homepage and
working their way through the site. So to them, the bar is just a waste
of valuable screen real estate. The first step in making navigation bars
handy in practice is to teach users that they exist and are a valuable
resource.
In the end, this experiment is trying to prove whether common sense works.
It seems natural that a navigation bar would be useful, no matter what.
Expert users could use it with ease in navigation. Beginning users would
just ignore them. Is that really the case though? Or would it simply
make the majority of web users happier to remove them and use that one
line of screen space for other information? The results of this
experiment will show if the navigation bars are truly useful or
not.
|