Boyce, S.J.; Pollastsek, A. & Rayner, K.(1989). Object Identification Depends on the Background Information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and Performance. 15(3), 556-566.
Christel, M. G. (1995). Addressing the Contents of Video in a Digital Library. Electronic Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Effective Abstractions in Multimedia (San Francisco: California, November 4, 1995).
Craik, F.I.M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., and Anderston, N.D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieving processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 159-180.
Dale, H. C. (1973). Short-Term Memory for Visual Information. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 1-8.
Ding, (1996). A Study on Video Browsing Strategies. http://www.learn.umd.edu/wp/speedexp.html
Elliot, E. (1993). Watch, grab, arrange, see: Thinking with motion images via streams and collages. MSVS Thesis Document. Cambridge, MA: MIT Media Lab.
England, P.; Allen, R.B.; Sullivan, M.; Heybey, A.; Bianchi, M. & Dailianas A. (1996). I/Browse: The Bellcore Video Library Toolkit. SPIE, (Jan. 1996). 1-11.
Kahneman, D.(1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kobla, V., Doermann, D., & Rosenfeld, A. (1996). Compressed domain video segmentation. Technical Report CAR-TR-839 CS-TR-3688, University of Maryland
LeDoux, J.E. and Hirst, W., eds. (1986). Mind and brain: Dialogues in cognitive neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Li, W.; Gauch, S.; Gauch, J. & Pua, K.M. (1996). VISION: A Digital Video Library. Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries (Bethesda: Maryland, March 20-23, 1996). 19-27.
Luck, S. J.; Hillyard, S. A. & Mouloua, M. (1996). Mechanisms of Visual-Spatial Attention: Resource Allocation or Uncertainty Reduction? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22(3), 725-737.
Marchionini, G. et. al.(1996). Interface Design Parameters for Effective Browsing: Surrogates and Control Mechanism for Video and Statistical Information. NSF-STIMULATE proposal.
Mills, M.; Cohen, J. and Wong, Y. (1992). A Magnifier Tool for Video Data. CHI ¹92 Conference Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems. (Monterey: CA., May 1992). 93-98.
O'Connor, B. C. (1985). Access to Moving Image Documents: Background Concepts and Proposals For Surrogates for Films. Journal of Documentation. 41(4), 209-220.
O'Connor, B. C. (1986a). Moving Image-Based Serial Publications. Serials Review. Summer & Fall, 19-24.
O'Connor, B. C. (1986b). Representation and the Utility of Moving Image Documents. Proceedings of 49th American Society of Information Science, v. 23, 237-243.
O'Connor, B. C. (1991). Selecting Key Frames of Moving Image Documents: a Digital Environment for Analysis and Navigation. Microcomputers for Information Management. 8(2), 119-133.
Pashler, H. (1990) Do response modality effects support multiprocessor models of divided attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 826-842.
Potter, M.C. & Levy, E. I. (1969) Recognition Memory for a Rapid Sequence of Pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 10-15. Cited from the NSF grant proposal by Marchionini et. al.
Smith, M. A.; & Kanade, T. (1995). Video Skimming for Quick Browsing Based on Audio and Image Characterization. Technical Report, CMU-CS-95-186.
Teodosio, L. & Bender, W. (1993). Salient Video Stills: Content and Context Preserved. ACM Multimedia, (6), 39-46.
Wactlar, H.; Kanade, T. & Stevens, S. (1996). Intelligent Access to Digital Video: Informedia Project. IEEE Computer, May, 46-52.
Wickens, C.D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. Second Edition. New York: HarperCollins.
Wickens, C.D., Sandry, D., & Vidulich, M. (1983). Compatability and resource competition between modalities of input, output, central processing. Human Factors, 25, 227-248.
Continue
Return to Comprehension and Object
Recognition Capabilities for Presentations of Simultaneous Video
Key Frame Surrogates