AMST 6xx
Un/Making
Citizenship:
A Critical Race Approach to the Asian American Experience
Instructor:
Jennifer Lau
Office:
Office Hours:
Email: jlau@union.umd.edu
Telephone:
Description
For more than one hundred and fifty years, immigrants from Asia have encountered the American legal system. This seminar explores the Asian American experience under Anglo-American legal ideology, with particular emphasis on rhetoric, history and cultural studies. As the course title indicates, the broad theme of (non)citizenship will engage us as we work through the methods through which Asian Americans were included or excluded within the continental United States*. We will explore some of these episodes where Asian Americans came into contact with the American legal system. Asian-Americans have also attempted to use the legal system to effect change, with varying levels of success. The relationship between law and social change, and the limits of liberal legal ideology, are covered in this seminar.
This seminar will be grounded in critical race theory (CRT) as a critique of racism in the law and society and discuss current applications of CRT to the field of Asian American Studies. The writings in this area have been developed mainly through the legal and education scholarship of Derrick Bell, Mari Matsuda, Richard Delgado, Kimberlie Crenshaw, Daniel Soloranzo, Gloria Ladson Billings and William Tate. Critical race theory has its roots in previous discipline-based critiques related to the history, philosophy, politics and social construction and reality of race and discrimination.
To that end the seminar will begin to help us answer questions such as the following: Is there only one Asian American experience? How do cultural studies inform our knowledge of what it means (or what it meant) to be Asian American in a U.S. legal context? Who belongs to Asian America? Who decides? What boundaries, borders, bodies and cultures were transgressed in the formation of these Asian American experiences? Given the black-white bilateral approach to U.S. civil rights legislation, what would a new model of (Asian) American civil rights look like? How do past Asian American legal politics impact contemporary politics? Is there such a thing as Asian American jurisprudence?
This course is meant to be an opportunity to engage with a number of critical theorists and legal studies scholars on what “Race, Rights and the Asian American Experience” mean to them – as well as what they mean to you. This course will focus broadly on the topics of immigration, citizenship, internment, and transnationalism. Legal documents, fiction, films and museum/memorial websites will be analyzed for the tropes that they evoke of Asian America.
This course is also meant to bring legal scholars and (Asian) Americanists into conversation with one another. No legal background is necessary, although an interest in examining legal rhetoric and Asian American jurisprudence is required. For those unfamiliar with critical race theory, Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic's Critical Race Theory: An Introduction (New York University Press, 2001) is a good, easy introduction. As well, an interest (or knowledge) of Asian American historical episodes would be most beneficial. The seminar will also be somewhat of an indulgence in Asian American scholarship, although of course, the definition of this literature can be (and will be) contested.
* Due to time constraints, this course will focus on the experience of Asian immigrants in the continental United States. Unfortunately, we will not be able to cover the experiences of Pacific Islander Americans which, of course, is both vastly similar and different to the experiences of Asian Americans and invokes perhaps a discourse of indigeneity rather than immigration.
Required Books:
Course
Requirements
This seminar explores a variety of approaches to analyzing the
Asian
American experience through a critical race lens. As such, this will
primarily
be a readings course. Students will bear the main responsibility for
leading
and participating in discussion. Please come prepared with a few
questions on
your own each week to help us work through the material.
Leading
the Discussion
By
11:00 a.m. – before each class - one member of the seminar will
distribute
a brief critical essay that he or she has prepared on the reading for
the week,
along with a set of discussion questions. Maximum length: 1000 words,
not including
questions. Everyone will be responsible for leading the discussion once
during
the semester. If you wish to discuss the readings before composing your
essay,
please feel free to contact the instructor.
Supplementing
the Syllabus
Each
member of the seminar will also be responsible for providing an
annotated bibliography
pertaining to that week's readings once per semester. The annotated
bibliography
will also be due by 11:00 a.m. before each class. Maximum length: three
pages.
A brief summary paragraph should be provided alongside of each your
choices,
explaining the major premises and connecting the texts (legal documents,
books,
films, websites, etc) to the theme for that week.
Autobiographical
Statement:
On the migrations, trajectories and discourses that have shaped your
lives
This statement is meant to be a jumping-off point of sorts, a situating
of self
within the trajectories that have shaped your own personal
scholarship. You
will be asked to present a ten-minute statement reflecting on the ways
that
immigration has shaped your subjectivity and that of the communities in
which
you place yourself. It is also meant to be your method of introduction
to your
fellow classmates. The autobiographical statement will not be graded. If
you are having trouble with this assignment,
please feel
free to contact the instructor. More will be said on this assignment in
our
first meeting.
For more on the place of autobiography within the legal academy, refer to Culp Jr., Jerome McCristal, “Autobiography and Legal Scholarship and Teaching: Finding the Me in the Legal Academy” in Richard Delgado, ed., Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge (Temple University Press, 1995).
Seminar
Paper: Episodes in Asian American Legal History
Given our rather broad and unwieldy course topic, the topic of
the
seminar paper will be left up to the individual student. The only
restriction
is that the essay should focus on an episode within
(Asian) American
legal history - more on my definiton of episodes
later. Students are
encourages to begin thinking about this early on in the semester -
please feel
free to consult me if you wish to discuss your topic
further.
Grading
Evaluations will be based on writing and on the quality of each member’s participation in the seminar. In oral presentations and in written work, strict adherence to the principles of academic and personal integrity is expected. The guidelines for conduct in the seminar will be discussed at the initial session.
Class
Participation:
40%
Leading Discussion:
10%
Supplementing the Syllabus: 10%
Seminar Paper: 40%
Week 1: Hellos and Introductions
Supplementary Reading:
Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, Critical Race Theory: An Introduction (New York University Press, 2001)
Week 2: Asian Americans and Critical Race Theory
Supplementary Reading:
Continue to skim Delgado and Stefancic's Critical Race Theory: An Introduction if necessary.
Week 3: Racial Formation Theory: A Different Breed of Orientalism?
Week 4: Immigration
Week 5: Citizenship
Supplementary Reading: George Lipsitz, The Possessive Investment in Whiteness: How White People Profit from Identity Politics (Temple UP, 1998), ch. 1-2.
Week 6: Who's Included in Asian America? (Part One)
Week 7: Who's Included in Asian America? (Part Two)
Week 8: Internment (Part One)
Week 9: Internment (Part Two)
Week 10: Remembering the Body
Week 11: The Model Minority
Week 12: Empire and Transnationalism
Week 13: Asian American Legal Scholarship
Week 14: Contemporary Politics
Week 15: Wrap up
Return
to Jennifer Lau's AMST 603 homepage
Copyright 2004
Last updated: March 31, 2004
University of Maryland, College Park