Syllabus
for American Studies 666: Contemporary Approaches to Cultural
Memory

Robert Chester
Office: 0132 Holzapfel Hall
Office Hours: By Appointment
Email: rchester@umd.edu
Telephone: 301-577-5702
Description
This course seeks to introduce graduate students to contemporary
approaches to the study of cultural memory through approaches influential in the field of American
studies. The class is focused on reading and discussion,
although a written final paper is required. We start by reading a number
of essays that have shaped scholarship of collective memory or that offer
a useful summary of trends and ideas in the field. Early in the course we
also examine some theoretical approaches to the study of popular
culture. We then move on to a discussion of nation-ness and
transnationality, postmodernity and visuality. These early weeks will
provide us with a working
vocabulary and theoretical lenses that can help shape our approaches to
the rest of the reading list. The bulk of the course is then given to
works dealing with memory in conjunction with issues which concern
American
studies: race, gender, sexuality, class, postcoloniality,
border studies, public history, and legal history among them. The course
also draws from a number of (inter)disciplines with which American studies
is in
dialogue: these include history, sociology, cultural studies,
ethnohistory, performance
studies, ethnic studies, and literary and film criticism. I have sought to
incorporate a variety of different sources: scholarly books and
articles, novels, and film. The syllabus seeks to offer an international
and comparative approach to American studies, placing the U.S.A. in relation to
some parts of the rest of the world. We will deal with readings that touch
on Japan, Korea, Guam, Puerto Rico, Argentina, Mexico, and
Brazil. Non-U.S. American scholars are included also. Through the diverse
scope of our (extensive) readings, we will interrogate differing forms of
memory, such as inscribed
memory, performed memory, oral memory, embodied memory, etc., as well as
the functions memory serves and the frictions it inevitably produces.
Week 1: Hellos, Orientations, and the Shape of Memory Studies (Part
I)
READINGS:
Pierre Nora, "Between History and Memory: Les Lieux de
Memoire," Representations 26 (Spring 1989), pp.7-24.
Barbie
Zelizer,
"Reading the Past Against the Grain: The Shape of Memory
Studies," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 12, no.2 (1995),
pp.214-239.
Toni Morrison, "Memory,
Creation, and Writing," in James
McConkey, ed., The Anatomy of
Memory (Oxford University Press,
1996), pp.212-225.
Week 2: The Shape of Memory Studies (Part II)

READINGS:
Paul Connerton, How Societies Remember (Cambridge
University Press, 1989).
Primo Levi, "The Memory of the
Offense," in
The Drowned and the Saved (New York: Vintage, 1989),
pp.23-36.
Natalie
Zemon
Davis and Randolph Starn, "Introduction," Representations 26
(Spring 1989), pp.1-6.
Michael Omi and Howard
Winant, "Racial Formation," in Racial Formation in
the United States, From the 1960s to the 1990s (New York: Routledge,
1994), pp.53-76
Week 3: Nations and Transnations
READINGS:
Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on
the
Origins and Spread of Nationalism, 2nd edition (New York: Verso,
1991).
Linda Basch, Nina Glick Schiller, and Cristina Szanton
Blanc,
Nations Unbound: Transnational Politics, Postcolonial Predicaments, and
Deterritorialized Nation-States (New York: Gordon & Breach, 1994),
chapters 1-2.
Chandra Talpade Mohanty, "Cartographies of
Struggle: Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism," in Mohanty,
Feminism Without Borders (Durham: Duke University Press,
2000), pp.43-84.
Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger,
"Introduction: Inventing
Traditions," in Hobsbawm and Ranger, eds., The Invention of
Tradition (Cambridge University Press, 1983),
pp.1-14.
Week 4: Collective Memory and Popular Culture

READINGS:
George Lipsitz, Time Passages: Collective Memory and
American
Popular Culture (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,
1990).
Stuart Hall, "Notes on Deconstructing 'the
Popular,'" in Raphael Samuel, ed., People's History and Socialist Theory
(London: Routledge, 1981), pp.227-239.
Antonio Gramsci,
"Hegemony,
Intellectuals, and the State," in John Storey, ed., Cultural Theory and
Popular Culture: A Reader (Harlow, Essex: Prentice Hall, 1998),
pp.210-216.
Raymond Williams, "Dominant, Residual, and
Emergent," in Williams, Marxism and Literature (Oxford University
Press, 1977), pp.121-127.
Week 5: Memory, Postmodernity, Visuality
READINGS:
Marita
Sturken, Tangled Memories: The Vietnam War, the AIDS Epidemic, and the
Politics of Remembering (Berkeley: University of California Press,
1997)
Jean Francois Lyotard, "The Postmodern
Condition," in Jeffrey C. Alexander and Steven Seidman, eds., Culture
and Society: Contemporary Debates (Cambridge UP, 1990),
pp.330-341.
Michael Paul Rogin, "Ronald Reagan, the
Movie," in Rogin, Ronald Reagan, the Movie and Other Episodes in
American Political Demonology (Berkeley: University of California
Press, 1987), pp.1-43.
Emily S. Rosenberg, A Date Which
Will
Live: Pearl Harbor in American Memory (Durham: Duke University Press,
2003), pp.99-189.
FILM: Michael Bay, Dir., Pearl
Harbor (2001).
Week 6: Remembering Internment

READINGS:
John Okada, No-No Boy (Seattle: University of
Washington Press, 1976 [1957]).
Lisa Lowe, Immigrant Acts: On
Asian
American
Cultural Politics (Durham: Duke University Press, 1996), Chapters
1-4.
Marita Sturken, "Absent Images of Memory: Remembering and Reenacting the
Japanese Internment," in T. Fujitani et.al., Perilous Memories: The
Asia-Pacific War(s) (Durham: Duke University Press, 2001),
pp.33-49.
John Streamas, "'Patriotic Drunk': To be Yellow, Brave,
and
Disappeared in Bad Day at Black Rock," American Studies, 44:1-2
(Spring/Summer 2003), pp.99-119
FILM: Rea Tajiri, Dir. History and Memory (1991).
Week 7: Landscapes of Remembering: Monuments and
Memorials
READINGS:
Edward T. Linenthal, The Unfinished Bombing: Oklahoma
City in
American Memory (Oxford University Press, 2001).
Kenneth
E. Foote,
Shadowed Ground: America's Landscapes of Violence and
Tragedy (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1997), pp.1-35.
James
E. Young, The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memorials and Meaning
(New Haven & London: Yale University Press, 1993),
pp.vi-xiii, 1-15.
Week 8: Remembering Slavery (Part I)

READING:
David W. Blight, Race and Reunion: The Civil War in
American
Memory (Cambridge, MA & London: The Belknap Press of Harvard
University Press, 2001).
Jon Ronson, "The Klansman
Who Won't Use the N-Word," in Ronson,
Them: Adventures With Extremists
(London: Picador, 2001), pp.174-201.
Week 9: Remembering Slavery (Part II)
READINGS:
Frances E. W. Harper, Iola Leroy (Boston: Beacon
Press, 1987 [1893]).
Carla L. Peterson, "Commemorative Ceremonies
and Invented Traditions: History, Memory, and Modernity in
the 'New Negro' Novel of the Nadir (1892-1903)" (unpublished draft,
2003).
Victoria E. Bynum, "Misshapen Identity: Memory, Folklore,
and the Legend of Rachel Knight," in Martha Hodes, ed., Sex, Love,
Race (NYU Press, 1999), pp.237-253.
Johnita Scott-Obadele,
"The
Modern Struggle for Reparations," in Herb Boyd, ed., Race and
Resistance: African Americans in the 21st Century (Cambridge,
MA: South End Press, 2002),
pp.143-152.
Week 10: Embodied Memories: Performance and Remembering in The
Americas
READINGS:
Diana Taylor, The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing
Cultural Memory in the Americas (Durham: Duke University Press,
2003).
T.J. Deschi Obi, "Combat and Crossing the Kalunga," in
Linda
Heywood, ed., Central Africans and Cultural Transformations in the
American Diaspora
(Cambridge University Press, 2002),
pp.353-372.
Henry Louis Gates, The Signifying Monkey: A Theory
of
African-American Literary Criticism (Oxford University Press, 1989),
Intro and Chapters 1-2.
Week 11: Memory and Orality: Native Peoples in the
Americas
READINGS:
Andrea Laforet, with Annie York, Spuzzum: Fraser Canyon
Histories, 1808-1939 (Ottawa: University of British Columbia Press,
1998).
James Clifford, "Identity in Mashpee," in
Clifford, The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography,
Literature, and Art (Harvard University Press, 1988),
pp.277-346.
Vine
Deloria, Jr., "Science and the Oral Tradition," in Deloria,
Red Earth, White Lies: Native
Americans and the Myth of
Scientific Fact (Golden,
CO: Fulcrum, 1997), pp.23-46.
Week 12: Public History and Culture Wars
READINGS:
Edward T. Linenthal, "Anatomy of a Crisis," pp.9-62
Paul Boyer, "Whose History is it Anyway? Memory, Politics, and Historical
Scholarship," pp.115-139; both in Linenthal and Tom Engelhardt, eds.,
History
Wars: The Enola Gay and Other Battles for the American Past (New
York: Metropolitan Books, 1996).
Lisa Yoneyama, "For Transformative
Knowledge and Postnationalist Public Spheres: The Smithsonian Enola Gay
Controversy," in Fujitani et. al., eds., Perilous Memories,
pp.323-346
Mike Wallace, "Mickey
Mouse History: Portraying the Past at Disney World," pp.33-57.
Roy
Rosenzweig,
"Marketing the Past: American Heritage and Popular History in the
United States, 1954-1984," pp.7-29; both in Radical History Review
32 (1985).
Daryle Williams, Culture Wars in
Brazil: The First
Vargas
Regime, 1930-1945 (Durham: Duke University Press,
2001), Introduction and Chapters 5-6.
Week 13: Memory, Postcoloniality, and Narrative
READINGS:
Amritjit Singh and Peter Schmidt, "On the Borders Between
U.S. Studies and Postcolonial Theory," pp.3-69
Jana Sequoya
Magdaleno,
"How (!) Is an Indian? A Contest of Stories, Round 2," pp.279-299.
Rhonda
Cobham, "Revisioning Our Kumblas: Transforming Feminist and Nationalist
Agendas in Three Carribean Women's Texts," pp.300-319.
Juan
Flores,
"Broken English Memories: Languages of the
Trans-Colony," pp.338-348.
Leny
Mendoza Strobel, "'Born Again Filipino': Filipino American Identity and
Asian Panethnicity," pp.349-369; all in Singh and Schmidt, eds.,
Postcolonial Theory and the United States: Race, Ethnicity, and
Literature (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi,
2000).
Week 14: Memory, Postcoloniality, and War
READINGS:
Frantz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth,
trans. Constance Farrington, (New York: Grove Press, 1963), especially
pp.166-189, and 207-248.
Lamont
Lindstrom, "Images of Islanders in Pacific War
Photographs," pp.107-128.
Vicente M. Diaz, "Deliberating
'Liberation
Day': Identity, History, Memory, and War in Guam," pp.155-180.
Utsumi
Aiko, "Korean 'Imperial Soldiers': Remembering Colonialism and Crimes
Against Allied POWs," pp.199-217.
Toyonaga Keisaburo, "Colonialism
and
Atom Bombs: About Survivors of Hiroshima Living in Korea," pp.395-410; all
in Fujitani et.al., eds., Perilous
Memories.
Week 15: Haunting
READINGS: Avery Gordon, Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological
Imagination (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press,
1997).
Paul West, "The Girls
and Ghouls of Memory," in
McConkey, ed., The Anatomy of Memory, pp.355-365.
Week 16: Memory and Murder

READING: Beth Loffreda, Losing Matt Shepard: Life and Politics in the
Aftermath of Anti-Gay Murder (New York: Columbia University Press,
2000).
Neil Gotanda, "Tales of Two
Judges: Joyce Karlin in People v. Soon Ja Du; Lance
Ito in People v. O.J. Simpson," in Wahneema Lubiano,
ed., The House That Race Built (New York: Vintage
Books, 1998): 66-86.
FILM: Moises
Kaufman, Dir., The Laramie Project (2001).
Course Requirements
Most importantly, students will
keep up
with each week's reading assignments and participate in discussion every
class period. Each of us is required to take responsibility for framing
class discussion on one occasion, offering questions and highlighting
additional material of interest to the class. Each week, one
student will be responsible for providing a supplementary
bibliography of some literature pertinent to that week's texts. Students
will also present a five-to-ten minute statement on the ways in which they feel collective memory and
tradition have shaped and continue to shape their own identities and
communities.
The major project of the semester is a journal-length article
(or an equivalent project in another form, such as film)
on any aspect of cultural memory relevant to American studies. Students
are encouraged to pursue their own interests and use their
imaginations here.
Reading and Seminar
Discussion
It
is essential to the effective functioning of the class that everyone do
their utmost to complete each reading assignment and spend a little time
considering what they have read before coming to class each week. I
appreciate that this can be difficult due to the pressures of time, but if
the seminar is to be productive for all of us, it will be because we are
all prepared and engaged. By its nature, American studies raises
sensitive issues that can sometimes provoke heated disagreements. As
important as each of our contributions is the understanding that we must
seek to remain respectful towards one another at all times. That said,
this is an academic seminar and is therefore an open forum for ideas to be
raised, debated, and analysed for strengths and weaknesses.
Leading Discussion
Everyone will
lead discussion once during the semester. The discussion leader is
required to provide a brief assessment of the major issues raised by the
readings, and to offer questions that enable the class to discuss the
merits and shortcomings of the texts. The presentation should be in the
form of a handout, and should not simply seek to restate the
readings. This is an important task, as the shape of our discussion will
be guided by the presenter's questions and analytical approaches. If the
discussion leader wishes to do more than a handout, or if she simply
wishes to discuss the readings before composing the handout, she is
welcome to
discuss this with the instructor.
Supplementary Bibliography
Assignment
Again on a once each basis, each week one
student
will be required to compile an annotated bibliography of 5-10 texts
complementary to
that week's assigned readings. Students should obviously not feel
obligated
to read ten books, but should seek instead to provide a brief summary
paragraph
alongside each of their choices, explaining the major arguments and
connecting the supplementary texts to the theme for that week. Again
this should be handed out to the class. Over the
course of the semester we will be producing a valuable bibliographic
resource of use to each of us.
Personal
Statement
This assignment is intended to provoke reflection on
the ways that collective memories and cultural traditions shape our own
lives, as well as a way to introduce ourselves to one another in a little
detail. Again,
this assignment will be a once only deal. You are asked to compose
statement of between five and ten minutes reflecting on the ways that
cultural memory has
shaped your own subjectivity and that of the communities with which you
identify. This, I think, will be a useful intellectual exercise through
which to think about our scholarship and politics, as well as the ways
that memory shapes and is shaped by the everyday. Remember, you aren't
being asked to justify your existence, nor to say any more than you choose
about your life.
Seminar Paper
This assignment is
almost entirely left to the individual student. The only restriction is
that the essay (or, as mentioned above, an alternative project such as a
film) deal with a subject related to cultural memory and American
studies. Students are encouraged to start thinking about this early in the
semester, and to consult with the instructor should they wish. The paper
should obviously follow the conventions of formal academic
writing.
Grading
Unfortunately, grades do not
disappear at this level. The percentages of your grade for each assignment
are as follows:
Class Participation: 30%
Leading
Discussion: 15%
Supplementary Bibliography: 15%
Final
Essay: 40%
The personal statement is, of course, not
graded.
Required Texts
Paul Connerton, How
Societies Remember, 1989.
Benedict Anderson, Imagined
Communities, 2nd edition, 1991.
George Lipsitz, Time Passages,
1990.
Marita Sturken, Tangled Memories, 1997.
John Okada,
No-No Boy, 1957.
Edward T. Linenthal, The Unfinished Bombing,
2001.
David W. Blight, Race and Reunion, 2001.
Frances
Harper, Iola Leroy, 1893.
Diana Taylor, The Archive and the
Repertoire, 2003.
Andrea Laforet, Spuzzum, 1998.
Avery
Gordon, Ghostly Matters, 1997.
Beth Loffreda, Losing Matt
Shepard, 2000.
T. Fujitani, Geoffrey M. White,
and Lisa Yoneyama, eds., Perilous Memories: The
Asia-Pacific War(s), 2001.
Integrity and Special
Needs
Plagiarism or any other kind of cheating is obviously
not permitted. Students who violate the University's Code of Academic
Integrity receive an XF grade. A fuller description of this is available
Here. Details
about the
University's Honor Pledge - "I pledge on my honor that I have not given or
received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment/examination" - are
available through the university's web site. If
you have any special needs, such as learning
disabilities, accomodations regarding access to classrooms, or anything
else, please inform the instructor quickly so that we can make
arrangements.
To My
Homepage
My Wired
Bibliography
Key
Texts
American
Studies 603 Class Homepage