Given that FORTRAN was not even widely available until 1957, this strikes me as a little unlikely.
But yeah, I'd say the wheel is the real giveaway.
Posted by Orin at December 17, 2004 10:36 PMhttp://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/computer.asp
But fun!
Posted by Ross at December 17, 2004 11:38 PMThe best part about it is actually the typography in the caption--very vintage looking and convincing, as is the multi-sentence format.
Posted by MGK at December 17, 2004 11:51 PMIt's a hoax, an image that was circulated around the Internet after a clever posting in a FARK photoshop contest--Popular Mechanics addresses the issue here:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/computers/2004/12/hoax/
To put on my textual studies beanie for a moment, and look only at the caption: Even if you did convince me that Fortran (invented in 1954 at IBM but not released commercially until years later) was going to be mentioned in a popular magazine article in 1954, I'd a lot of trouble believing that it would be typeset as "Fortran" rather than "FORTRAN," as it consistently was for decades afterwards and often still is. Also, I would think that "teletype" would be at least be capitalized, and maybe used with another word, as the Teletype Corporation was well-known in those days at it would be obvious that "Teletype" was a trade name.
Posted by nick at December 18, 2004 01:09 AMI smelled a rat after the solecism of "how a 'home computer' could look like" vs "what a 'home computer' could look like".
Posted by Ross at December 18, 2004 09:00 AMThe teletype in the foreground is OBVIOUSLY too new -- it's 1970's vintage. The model 33 (introduced ten years after this picture) still had roll-feed paper, cylindrical keys, and no caps.
Posted by Mark Bernstein at December 18, 2004 11:21 AMAnd the socks the "scientist" is wearing use a stitch that was not widely known outside of East Timor until the early nineties.
This one resurfaced a little while ago.
The first tip-off for me was that the caption text was so loosely written.
Two of the four sentences are subordinate clauses, there are no hyphens in "not yet invented," and there's a split infinitive ("to actually work").
As for the sock sitches... is this the latest in digital image analysis -- the ability to see through the caption text that has been superimposed upon Clarence the "It's a Wonderful Life" Angel's feet?
Posted by Dennis G. Jerz at December 20, 2004 07:33 AMAnd the socks the "scientist" is wearing use a stitch that was not widely known outside of East Timor until the early nineties.
LOLOL.
Posted by Aaron at December 23, 2004 01:14 PM