Rob Cantrell
Amst 205
November 14, 1995
Project 3: Artifact of
Appearance
Fred Davis, in his book Fashion,
Culture, and Identity, argues the idea that what we wear communicates
who we are. He further states that through fashion, we create an image
that we want to display, along with our beliefs, values, and status.
Reflecting on this position, I had great difficulty citing examples in my
own case. What I wear has almost nothing to do with who I am. Since my
wife buys all my clothes, I simply wear what I find in my closet. I
guess I could say that my appearance is a reflection of what my wife sees
in me. In other words, I am "fashion indifferent". This is a
term that Davis uses to define those individuals who simply do not care
about fashion. That is me...what I wear has no predetermined meaning.
On an average day, I wear a shirt or sweater, blue jeans, and tennis
shoes. Not to project a certain image or status, but simply because they
are comfortable. I style my hair in a way to keep it out of my eyes. I
don't have tatoos. I don't wear jewelry. And, I have a beard for the
simple fact that I don't like to shave.
However, there is one
item that I wear that has special meaning...my wedding ring. Pictured
below is my ring...
Through simple analysis, one can see that this is a 14 karat gold,
diamond cut, wedding ring. Since it is relatively new, it happens to be
in rather good shape. Made in a size eight, it fits my left ring finger
perfectly. It cost roughly two hundred dollars when it was purchased
almost two years ago. The function of this ring is that it serves as an
indication that I am married. Rings, in general, are worn for various
purposes: to indicate marital status, to beautify, to show pride in an
accomplishment (eg., super bowl ring), to show an affiliation, and, as
Davis points out, to "flaunt" status.
Though my ring
is not as fancy or as expensive as other male wedding rings, it serves
its function well. I am proud to wear it and to allow other people to
see me wearing it, for it helps to portray an image of a "family" man.
Since the beginning of time, jewelry, specifically rings, have
been around. Though, traditionally, jewelry was worn by the elite,
through what Davis terms "The Trickle-Down Theory", jewelry
became more accessible for the middle and lower classes. In America,
with the technological advances in the manufacture of jewelry, it is not
uncommon to find people of all classes adorning rings. Generally
speaking, the types and quantity of rings worn by Americans is gender
specific...men will typically wear one or two, if any; women will wear
anywhere from none to one on each finger, sometimes even more than that.
Additionally, mens rings tend to be more conservative and less flashy
than womens rings. While I understand that there are obvious exceptions
to this, I do feel that this is a general observation.
Davis
points out in his book that there is a lot of ambiguity in the meaning of
clothes and other fashion accessories. Excepting that rings are a part
of fashion, it is clear then that there should be a lot of ambiguities in
the meaning of rings. This is clearly evident, for example, when we see
that even though a wedding ring generally means a person is
"attached" and unavailable, they may still be approached by
someone who feels marriage and the wearing of a wedding ring doesn't
signify commitment. Similarly, while one person may wear a ring for
religious reasons, another person may wear the same ring simply because
it looks good. Consequently, it is hard to determine exactly why a
specific person wears a specific ring; and, the meaning to that person
may be entirely different than what another person may perceive.
However, when talking about wedding rings, it can be generally inferred
that the wearer is signifying a commitment and love to a spouse.
Through analysis using Davis' guidelines, it is clear that what I
wear, namely my wedding ring, communicates a part of myself. Being
married to someone that you love and admire is really special. The
meaning goes a little deeper, though. Before I married my present wife,
I had been married to another woman for three years. However, my ex-wife
did not share the same commitment as I, and, consequently, our marriage
was destroyed. Though it was a painful experience, I learned a lot from
it. One of the hardest parts of that ordeal was removing my old ring,
never to wear it again. With my present wife, I wear my ring proudly.
It constantly reminds me that, after the toughest of times, the happiest
of times will soon follow.
Thank You for reading
Project 3: Artifact of Appearance