abby homepage

GREENBELT VS COLUMBIA

ARE THEY MORE SIMILAR OR MORE DIFFERENT?

Planned cites are a rare concept for most of America. There are few of them, and most are not very well known. I have been lucky to experience two planned communities in my life by growing up in Columbia, Maryland and going to school close to Greenbelt, Maryland. Both places have very special qualities, and were built on certain utopian ideals that formed the basis of the communities. What I would like to ask, is are they more similar or more different?

The plans for Columbia, Maryland started to develop in 1962 when James Rouse, of the Rouse Company, formed a partnership to buy land. James Rouse, at the time, was a developer who made home loans as a mortgager. The Rouse Company brought in Connecticut Mutual president Mr. Wilde to help fund the building. After they joined forces, Columbia was well on its way.

Wilde Lake Village Center

The original plans of Columbia, consisted of seven villages, each with its own village center, which consits of shops, a supermarket, and other specialty stores, and a community center. Each village is made up of neighborhoods which has its own elementary school, many with pools, and some with neighboorhood centers. All of the street names in Columbia would be named after American poets and their poems. For example, Longfellow is the name of a neighborhood in the village of Harper's Choice, and some street names there, are Paul Revere's Ride, Evangeline Way and Blacksmith Drive.

The first twenty families moved into the first neighborhood, Bryant Woods, around 1966. The families were from different races, religions and backgrounds and included James Rouse, who ended up living in that same house until he died. In 1967, construction for the Columbia Mall was started and that really began the flock of people wanting to move there.

James Rouse had high hopes for Columbia. His plans reflected his utopian ideals for a community. He wanted a place where all kinds of people could live in peace, as a community, without any of the racial tensions or barriers that other cities possessed. There were many ways that he felt he could accomplish this. One, is that no one would have their own mailbox at the end of their driveway. There would be a group mailbox, so that people would be forced to meet their neighbors at the mailbox and talk to one another. Another way, was that there would be no churches or synagogues. Instead, there would be Interfaith Centers where different congregations, whether it be Jewish, Catholic or something else, would share the same praying space. In order to keep the community like atmosphere, and away from the city life, The Rouse Company agreed that there would be no telephone wires streaming across the streets, instead they would all be underground. This would also keep the children from getting hurt with live wires. The children have many tot lots, or playgrounds, to play in, which can be arrived via paths, and are all away from street traffic. The paths in Columbia can take you from neighborhood to neighborhood around the city, never crossing a major street. They lead you to lakes, parks, tot lots, housing, schools, and even the mall.

The original plans for housing in Columbia, included single family homes, apartments, and townhouses. In the late seventies, they added what is called Section 8 housing, otherwise known as low income housing. There about seven low income housing developments that exist now in Columbia.

When you buy a house in Columbia, you sign a covenant in which you agree to keep your house a certain way, and is monitored by the architectural committee. Some stipulations in this agreement are that you wont make any changes to your house without getting a petition signed by your neighbors, and it gets approved by the committee. Each village has its own committee, made up of volunteers, and have the same rules. Additionally, the commitee goes around to houses, telling the owners what they have to put up or take down. For example, the commitee told my father that he had to build a flower box on our driveway in front of our house. Although completely against the idea, he built it, but it was not before long that he ended up tearing it down. The have not mentioned it again. Also, they tried to make a friend of mine take down a tree house that had been there for ever. They petitioned it many times, and the board finally allowed them to keep it up. Before there was enough people to make village commitees, the Rouse Company was the governing body of the archtectual needs. The Rouse Company also said, that until there was enough people living there, they would make all of the decisions reguarding streets, open space, housing, etc.

As soon as there was a certain amount of residents, they would form the Columbia Association, which would make all of the decisions reguarding streets, open space and build recreational facilities. The Columbia Association started within three years, and soon became a large business. Since then, they have built 23 outdoor pools, two indoor pools, two athletic clubs, two golf courses, three tennis clubs, an ice skating rink, rollerskating rink, three lakes and a boat docks. Columbia Association also runs the community and neighborhood centers, takes care of all the open space areas, tot lots, paths, public bus transportation, roads and many other services.

Columbia has added two additional villages to the original seven, and has expanded dramatically its businesses and commercialism. There are may strip shopping centers, fast food restaurants, gas stations, schools and other industrialized buildings. Even though these were not in the original plan, Columbia is still very much as James Rouse envisioned it, and when he died in 1996, he was extremely proud of what Columbia turned out to be.

Columbia is criticized by many outsiders because of all of its rules and regulations. But, for those who live there, most, appreciate all that it has to offer. Because it is centered between Baltimore and Washington, it has a very large mix of people who are there for different reasons. The fact that many of the high schools have students from low income housing, middle and high income families attending the same school, and get along, is remarkable. Even if it has failed as a planned community, it has not failed in bringing all kinds of people together, as one community.

After the depression, many Americans were out of work, and homes. Franklin D. Roosevelt had many different plans, otherwise known as The New Deal or "Alphabet Soup" to help rebuild the American economy and spirit. One of his many plans included the Resettlement Administration which was headed by Rexford G. Tugwell, a former assistant secretary of agriculture. He came up with plans for new "Green" towns, which would model the garden cities of the British. Only three of his twenty-five plans got developed, they were; Greenbelt, Maryland, Greenhills, Ohio, and Greendale, Wisconsin. These Green towns would be federally owned and operated, and would provide work and housing relief for many families affected during the depression.

Franklin Roosevelt and Rexford Tugwell had envisioned the new towns to be the ideal community to live and raise a family. Greenbelt would be surrounded by a green belt of trees to keep away from the city atmosphere. There would also be paths and play areas for children so they would be away from the busy streets. As Westly Alexander discusses, Greenbelt was designed for cul-de-sacs for children to play and there would be pedestrian walk ways and underpasses. As Brian Greaves says in his project, this made it so that everyone was close to each other and could make for very close bonds between one another.

In 1935, the land was bought for Greenbelt, Maryland and in 1936, construction began. The construction workers were only those who were out of work, and needed a job. They built 885 units, mostly group townhomes, and apartments, with a few detached houses.

There would be a community center for the residents to gather. There would be no churches or synagogues, since Greenbelt was on federally owned land, it would have violated the constitution if they built any kind of religious building.

There were many rules and regulations for the city of Greenbelt. First of all, in order to live there, you had to go through a rather long and competitive screening process. One would have to send in an application and then have multiple interviews before being accepted for living. The family income had to fall within $800-$2000 and you were granted housing depending on how many people were in your family, but it could be no more than four. Blacks and other minorities were not accepted, even though they helped build the city. Jewish people were allowed from the start, but there were not very many of them.

There were other rules that you had to follow, both physically and socially. Pets were not allowed in Greenbelt, in order to keep the cleanliness. There were strict policies about keeping the inside of your house clean, and they were often inspected to make sure the women was doing her job by cleaning the house. Also, the hedges on your house had to be kept at a certain height, and the laundry from the clotheslines had to be in by 4 p.m. Women were not allowed to wear shorts in the community centers and public places, and pregnant women could not wear shorts at all. Some did not want pregnant women to even go to the community centers at all, even if in skirts or dresses.

All of the businesses in Greenbelt were run and operated as a co-op. The theaters, gas stations, and grocery stores, to name a few, were all bought and operated by community members and the profits were returned to the customers in the form of dividends. The Farm Security Administration provided furniture for a very low price on a credit system, for the newly arriving residents.

Many people liked Greenbelt, including FDR and Tugwell, because everyone was of the same social status. There were no rich and poor, rather, everyone was equal. Because business were run as a co-op, there was no competition, and the community centers allowed for the residents to come together. The streets were all designed the same and there were no rich or poor sections of town.

Greenbelt was sold to the Greenbelt Veterans Housing Corporation in 1953 and it was open to anyone who wanted to live there. Many original residents decided to buy their home and many Washingtonians bought houses as well. It started to become more industrialized, opening up office buildings, fast food chains, hotels, and malls.

Some might say that Greenbelt failed, but others say that it served its purpose. It got a community on its feet after the depression, and opened up a lot of jobs and housing for people. From the people who lived there, for the most part, really enjoyed the community and family like atmosphere it provided. There were safe play areas for children and there was no social competition. Even though Greenbelt is no longer the same as it was in the thirties, it is still a very important part of the housing history for Americans.

There are many similarities and differences between Columbia and Greenbelt. For example, they are both planned communities, which were built on certain utopian ideals. Columbia was a place for all races, religions and economic status could live together. This was the whole basis on why Columbia was formed. If James Rouse did not have this vision in mind, Columbia would not have been designed in the way that it did. Greenbelt, on the other hand, was formed for white, predominantly Christian people, of the same income bracket, to live as a community. The signigicance of the Greenbelt planning was to ensure that everyone had a job, and was on equal social status. The utopian ideal of this plan was for everything to run as a community, not as individuals. Even though the details are different, they were still built on the same principles.

Another example is that of the rules that each possesses. Columbia and Greenbelt have many regulations concerning what can and can not be done to the house. Columbia has strict rules enforced by the archetectual commitee, which is a major part of owning a house there. Greenbelt, had more rules of social behavior rather than the way you kept your house. Both communities wanted you to keep the outside of your house a certain way, whether it be keeping the hedges clean, or requesting permission to paint your house. Also, Columbia did not allow laundry lines outside at all, and in Greenbelt, you had to take the clothes off by 4 o'clock.

Both places had the community centers for people to gather and participate in activities. The purpose of them was to get the residents out of the house and talk to the other people, to be a community. Both cities also, are not allowed churches and synagogues, even if they are for different reasons.

So, even though the specifics of Columbia and Greenbelt are different, the general ideas that they were built on are very similar. The most important things being the utopian ideals and the rules that they provide. Both places have changed drastically over the years that they have existed, and the developers probably never imagined they would have turned out like they are. Columbia and Greenbelt have turned out to be very unique and special historical places to live and visit and should be appreciated for what they have given their residents.